§ The result
Resume Worded leads Sensei AI on all 7 criteria.
Rubric js-v1.0 puts 27 points between Resume Worded (Resume AI) and Sensei AI (Live interview): 60 (D) for Resume Worded, 33 (F) for Sensei AI. Resume Worded leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Application Honesty among them; Sensei AI leads none. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Employer & ATS Legitimacy (Resume Worded 75, Sensei AI 25) and Application Honesty at 20% (Resume Worded 58, Sensei AI 20), the second being 28% of the weighted advantage Resume Worded holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Resume Worded
Resume Worded scores an uploaded resume or LinkedIn profile PDF out of 100 against its own recruiter-derived checklist and returns line-by-line feedback, AI rewrite suggestions and job-description keyword matching, but does not search for or submit job applications.
Vendor profile
Sensei AI
Sensei AI is a real-time interview copilot that listens to a candidate's live job interview, transcribes the interviewer's questions and displays structured, resume-tailored answers on screen in about a second, with an added coding copilot and AI resume builder.
§ The record
Resume Worded is filed under Resume & profile AI, Sensei AI under Live interview assistance. They record no secondary category in common.
| Record | Resume Worded | Sensei AI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | High | High |
| Headquarters | GB | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2024 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 28% of the movement so far
Application Honesty
Resume Worded 58 · Sensei AI 20
7.6 weighted points to Resume Worded
15% weight · 56% of the movement so far
Employer & ATS Legitimacy
Resume Worded 75 · Sensei AI 25
7.5 weighted points to Resume Worded
20% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Data & Credential Safety
Resume Worded 64 · Sensei AI 42
4.4 weighted points to Resume Worded
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
User Control & Transparency
Resume Worded 72 · Sensei AI 48
3.6 weighted points to Resume Worded
8% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Support & Accountability
Resume Worded 66 · Sensei AI 38
2.2 weighted points to Resume Worded
12% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Effectiveness Evidence
Resume Worded 34 · Sensei AI 22
1.4 weighted points to Resume Worded
10% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Pricing & Cancellation Fairness
Resume Worded 42 · Sensei AI 38
0.4 weighted points to Resume Worded
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +27.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 27.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +27 beside that +27.2.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Resume Worded minus Sensei AI.
| Category | Weight | Resume Worded | Sensei AI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Honesty | 20% | 58 | 20 | +38 | +7.6 |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 64 | 42 | +22 | +4.4 |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 72 | 48 | +24 | +3.6 |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 75 | 25 | +50 | +7.5 |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 34 | 22 | +12 | +1.4 |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 42 | 38 | +4 | +0.4 |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 66 | 38 | +28 | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 60 (D) | 33 (F) | +27 | +27.2 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Resume Worded | Sensei AI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Application Honesty | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data & Credential Safety | 20% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| User Control & Transparency | 15% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Employer & ATS Legitimacy | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Effectiveness Evidence | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Pricing & Cancellation Fairness | 10% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Support & Accountability | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 28 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 23 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Resume Worded has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Sensei AI has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Sensei AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Resume Worded, across 6 distinct source domains, and 31 for Sensei AI, across 8 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- js-v1.0
- Resume Worded last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Sensei AI last reviewed
- September 4, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next