HomeCompareSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs Sense

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs Sense

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Sense leads SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting by 5 points.

Sense scores 58 and SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 53 under rubric v1.0, a 5-point gap across the Screening and ATS-integrated cohorts. Sense leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads 2, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, and 1 is level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40, Sense 72 — and at an 18% weight it carries 73% of the weighted advantage Sense holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Sense under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingSense
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersDEUS
Founded19722016

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 57% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Sense 72

    5.8 weighted points to Sense

  2. 20% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 · Sense 60

    2.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Sense 52

    1.4 weighted points to Sense

  4. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35 · Sense 38

    0.4 weighted points to Sense

  5. 15% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60 · Sense 58

    0.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Sense 64

    0.2 weighted points to Sense

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -5.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -5 beside that -5.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting minus Sense.

CategoryWeightSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingSenseΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7060+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4072-32-5.8
FRIA Support15%3538-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%6058+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6264-2-0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4052-12-1.4
Customer Documentation8%6262--
Total100%53 (F)58 (F)-5-5.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingSense
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on a separate domain30Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on a separate domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain163Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Sense has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and Sense sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 41 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains, and 19 for Sense, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Sense last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.