HomeCompareSAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs Tengai

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting vs Tengai

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting leads Tengai on all 7 criteria.

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 11 points above Tengai, filed under Screening: 53 against 42 under rubric v1.0. Of the 7 criteria Tengai wins none, and the narrowest lead SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds is on Human Oversight Design, SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 to Tengai 58. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70, Tengai 45 — and at a 20% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Tengai under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Tengai is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingTengai
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersDESE
Founded19722019

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 70 · Tengai 45

    5.0 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  2. 15% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 60 · Tengai 50

    1.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  3. 18% weight · 73% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Tengai 33

    1.3 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  4. 15% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 35 · Tengai 28

    1.1 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  5. 12% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 40 · Tengai 33

    0.8 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  6. 8% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Tengai 55

    0.6 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting 62 · Tengai 58

    0.5 weighted points to SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +10.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +10.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting minus Tengai.

CategoryWeightSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingTengaiΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%7045+25+5.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4033+7+1.3
FRIA Support15%3528+7+1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%6050+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%6258+4+0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%4033+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%6255+7+0.6
Total100%53 (F)42 (F)+11+10.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightSAP SuccessFactors RecruitingTengai
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%20Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%175Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain375Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 17 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Tengai has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 37 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting and Tengai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting, across 3 distinct source domains, and 42 for Tengai, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
SAP SuccessFactors Recruiting last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tengai last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.