§ The result
Tezi leads Workstream by 19 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Tezi opens a 19-point lead on Workstream, 58 to 39, with both scored in the Screening cohort. Workstream takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Customer Documentation among them, against 6 for Tezi, whose share includes Bias Audit Transparency. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Tezi 83, Workstream 20) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 58% of the weighted advantage Tezi holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Tezi
Tezi's product "Max" is an autonomous AI recruiting agent that sources passive candidates, screens and ranks inbound applications via conversational chat, and schedules interviews, integrating with ATS and calendar tools.
Vendor profile
Workstream
Workstream is a mobile-first HR, payroll and hiring platform for hourly, multi-location employers such as QSR franchisees. Its hiring suite pairs a text-to-apply applicant tracking system with VoiceAI phone screens and VideoAI asynchronous video interviews, which return transcripts, AI summaries, pass/fail results for each question and match scores.
§ The record
Tezi and Workstream are both filed under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Scheduling.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Workstream is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Tezi | Workstream |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2024 | 2017 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Tezi 83 · Workstream 20
11.3 weighted points to Tezi
12% weight · 70% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Tezi 58 · Workstream 35
2.8 weighted points to Tezi
20% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Tezi 52 · Workstream 40
2.4 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Tezi 38 · Workstream 27
1.6 weighted points to Tezi
15% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Tezi 55 · Workstream 47
1.2 weighted points to Tezi
8% weight · 99% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Tezi 50 · Workstream 56
0.5 weighted points to Workstream
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Tezi 63 · Workstream 61
0.2 weighted points to Tezi
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +19.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +19 beside that +19.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Tezi minus Workstream.
| Category | Weight | Tezi | Workstream | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 40 | +12 | +2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 20 | +63 | +11.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 27 | +11 | +1.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 47 | +8 | +1.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 63 | 61 | +2 | +0.2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 58 | 35 | +23 | +2.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 50 | 56 | -6 | -0.5 |
| Total | 100% | 58 (F) | 39 (F) | +19 | +19.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Tezi | Workstream | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | — | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 3 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Tezi has 14 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 3 documented absences; Workstream has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tezi and Workstream sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 14 for Tezi, across 2 distinct source domains, and 34 for Workstream, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Tezi last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Workstream last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next