HomeCompareWorkstream vs Zoho Recruit

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Workstream vs Zoho Recruit

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

3 points separate Zoho Recruit and Workstream.

Zoho Recruit holds a 3-point edge over Workstream under rubric v1.0, 42 to 39, across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Zoho Recruit: Zoho Recruit is ahead on Data Governance Disclosure and Workstream on Human Oversight Design. Human Oversight Design is at once the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing, and it belongs to Workstream — Workstream 61, Zoho Recruit 50, on a 12% weight — which is 100% of the weighted advantage Workstream holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

Workstream is filed under Screening AI, Zoho Recruit under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordWorkstreamZoho Recruit
Price tierMidLow
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded20171996

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 24% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Workstream 61 · Zoho Recruit 50

    1.3 weighted points to Workstream

  2. 15% weight · 45% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Workstream 47 · Zoho Recruit 55

    1.2 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  3. 20% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Workstream 40 · Zoho Recruit 45

    1.0 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  4. 18% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Workstream 20 · Zoho Recruit 24

    0.7 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  5. 12% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Workstream 35 · Zoho Recruit 40

    0.6 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  6. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Workstream 27 · Zoho Recruit 30

    0.4 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Workstream 56 · Zoho Recruit 60

    0.3 weighted points to Zoho Recruit

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -3.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Workstream minus Zoho Recruit.

CategoryWeightWorkstreamZoho RecruitΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4045-5-1.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%2024-4-0.7
FRIA Support15%2730-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%4755-8-1.2
Human Oversight Design12%6150+11+1.3
Post-Market Monitoring12%3540-5-0.6
Customer Documentation8%5660-4-0.3
Total100%39 (F)42 (F)-3-3.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightWorkstreamZoho Recruit
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%70Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%286Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain107Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Workstream has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Zoho Recruit has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 10 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Workstream sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 51 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Workstream, across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Zoho Recruit, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Workstream last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Zoho Recruit last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.