ADP

ADP is an enterprise human capital management and payroll provider whose recruiting suite uses AI to parse, rank, and match job applicants via its Candidate Relevancy tool, ADP Assist generative-AI assistant/job-description generator, and skills intelligence.
ATS-integratedScreening

HireAIScore rates ADP 48 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed July 17, 2026. ADP ranks 29 of 77 vendors rated in ATS-integrated AI, against a category average of 47. That score is drawn from 23 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for ADP — 18 with a cited source, 5 recording that nothing was located.

Score breakdown

ADP, criterion by criterion

Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20% · avg 51

    53

    +10.6

  2. Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18% · avg 41

    46

    +8.3

  3. FRIA Support

    Weight 15% · avg 32

    28

    +4.2

  4. Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15% · avg 54

    57

    +8.5

  5. Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12% · avg 57

    55

    +6.6

  6. Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12% · avg 42

    45

    +5.4

  7. Customer Documentation

    Weight 8% · avg 59

    58

    +4.6

Total weighted score

48.3(rounded to 48 for display)

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 77 ATS-integrated AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Strongest criterion

Customer Documentation

58raw / 100

Contributes 4.6 to the total. 58 against a 59 category average.

Weakest criterion

FRIA Support

28raw / 100

Contributes 4.2 to the total. 28 against a 32 category average.

Cited evidence

The evidence behind the score

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.

Download diligence record

Evidence ledger

Items
23
Documentation
16
Public statement
2
Absence
5
With a source URL
18 of 23
Source hostnames
3
Fewest items
2
FRIA Support

These figures measure how thoroughly ADP was reviewed, not how ADP performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

3 items53

Bias Audit Transparency

3 items46
  • Public statementCaptured Jul 17, 2026

    ADP states a '2024 evaluation conducted by an independent auditor concluded there was no statistical evidence of bias' in Candidate Relevancy recommendations, but does not name the auditor or link a report.

    https://www.adp.com/what-we-offer/ai-solutions/responsible-ai.aspx

  • DocumentationCaptured Jul 17, 2026

    Recruiting Management feature page describes an 'unbiased algorithm' delivering a side-by-side candidate relevancy comparison, with Candidate Relevancy trained on skills/education/experience rather than protected demographics.

    https://apps.adp.com/en-US/apps/141660/adp-recruiting-management/features

  • AbsenceCaptured Jul 17, 2026

    No downloadable bias-audit report and no publicly posted NYC Local Law 144 AEDT audit summary for ADP were found via ADP's site or NYC DCWP AEDT resources.

    Have a URL that disputes this?

FRIA Support

2 items28

Data Governance Disclosure

4 items57

Human Oversight Design

3 items55

Post-Market Monitoring

4 items45

Customer Documentation

4 items58

Editorial notes

Company overview

ADP (Automatic Data Processing), founded in 1949 and headquartered in Roseland, New Jersey, is one of the world's largest HCM and payroll providers, serving tens of millions of workers across roughly 140 countries. Its recruiting stack - ADP Workforce Now Recruitment and ADP Recruiting Management - layers AI onto the ATS: Candidate Relevancy parses resumes and delivers a graphical side-by-side ranking of how closely each applicant's skills, education, and experience match a job description, while ADP Assist (generative AI) powers a skills-focused job-description generator and a chat-based HR assistant. Recruiting AI is a modest slice of a payroll-centric business, so its public AI documentation is oriented around company-wide data-ethics posture rather than product-specific model transparency.

Regulatory exposure

ADP's Candidate Relevancy tool ranks and scores applicants, placing it squarely inside NYC Local Law 144's Automated Employment Decision Tool scope and within EU AI Act Annex III high-risk employment scope, with additional exposure under Illinois and Colorado AI-hiring rules. ADP states the tool is not trained on protected demographic attributes and cites a 2024 independent evaluation that found no statistical evidence of bias, but it publishes no downloadable audit report, names no auditor, and provides no NYC LL 144 public audit summary. There is no EU AI Act deployer guidance, FRIA template, or ISO 42001 material anywhere on its public site; security certifications (ISO 27001/27701, SOC 1/SOC 2 Type 2) exist but are gated behind NDA.

Path to a higher score

ADP could move materially higher by publishing the referenced independent bias audit as a downloadable report (named auditor, date, methodology, intersectional results) and posting recurring NYC LL 144 summaries. Pursuing ISO 42001 certification and releasing per-system technical documentation, model cards, and instructions-for-use would lift the Article 11 and data-governance scores. Adding explicit EU AI Act deployer guidance and a FRIA support package, documenting in-product explainability and audit-log/override controls, and offering a public trust portal (rather than NDA-gated certs) plus an AI-specific status/changelog channel would close the remaining gaps.

Regulatory frame

What applies to ATS-integrated AI.

Ranking features are inside EU AI Act Annex III §4 (high-risk) and inside NYC Local Law 144 when they affect NYC-based candidates. Customers should treat the AI surface as a distinct deployer-FRIA scope from the rest of the ATS.

Keep reading

All ATS-integrated vendorsHow this score is builtAnnex IV section-by-section: what AI hiring vendors must documentWhat makes a defensible NYC LL 144 bias audit

Compare

ADP against its nearest-scoring peers.

The closest scores in ATS-integrated AI, side by side.

Build any comparison

Ranking

Others rated in ATS-integrated AI

Ranked 29 of 77 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. #26Lever49F
  2. #27Oracle Recruiting49F
  3. #28Avature48F
  4. #29ADPThis profile48F
  5. #30Workable48F
  6. #31Employment Hero48F
All ATS-integrated vendors

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.