The Index · Regulations
The regulations shaping AI in hiring.
Five instruments. Each page covers what the rule requires, who’s affected, key deadlines, deployer obligations, common misconceptions, and how vendors are addressing it. The rubric anchors every sub-criterion to a specific article and citation, so scores remain auditable.
§ Timeline
In effective-date order, earliest first.
Status reflects today’s date.
- № 01Class action
Mobley v. Workday
US Federal (N.D. Cal.); ADA, ADEA, Title VII claims
The class-action case shaping US vendor-liability case-law for AI hiring. Live as of 2026-05-21.
- № 02In force
NYC LL 144
New York City, USA
NYC LL 144 requires employers using AEDTs for NYC-based candidates to commission annual independent bias audits, publish results, and give candidate notice. In force since 2023.
- № 03In force
Illinois HB 3773
Illinois, USA
Illinois HB 3773 extends the Illinois Human Rights Act to cover AI-driven employment decisions. Effective 1 January 2026.
- № 04June 30, 2026
Colorado AI Act
Colorado, USA
Colorado's first-in-the-US AI Act covers consequential decisions including employment. Effective 30 June 2026.
- № 05August 2, 2026
EU AI Act
European Union
How the EU AI Act treats AI in hiring, what deployer obligations apply from August 2026, and how to map vendor evidence onto Annex IV and Article 27.