HomeVendorsAmazingHiring
Profile · Vendor·Sourcing

AmazingHiring

A technical-talent sourcing platform that aggregates public developer profiles from 50+ networks (GitHub, Stack Overflow, Kaggle, LinkedIn) and uses AI to rank and surface candidates for recruiters, with verified-contact retrieval and outreach automation.

HireAIScore rates AmazingHiring 37 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed July 17, 2026. AmazingHiring ranks 43 of 49 vendors rated in Candidate sourcing AI, against a category average of 48. That score is drawn from 18 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for AmazingHiring — 12 with a cited source, 6 recording that nothing was located.

§ 01 - Company facts

Legal name
Amazing Hiring
Founded
2011
Headquarters
United States · US
Pricing tier
Mid
Market side
Employer-side (AEDT)
Categories
Sourcing
Website
amazinghiring.com

These are company details, not findings. They are editable by a verified representative and carry no weight in the score, which is built only from the cited evidence below.

§ 02 - Score breakdown

§ Score breakdown

Category scoring

Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.

  1. 01

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Weight 20%

    35

    +7.0 · category avg 51

  2. 02

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Weight 18%

    22

    +4.0 · category avg 47

  3. 03

    FRIA Support

    Weight 15%

    30

    +4.5 · category avg 32

  4. 04

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Weight 15%

    50

    +7.5 · category avg 54

  5. 05

    Human Oversight Design

    Weight 12%

    48

    +5.8 · category avg 56

  6. 06

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Weight 12%

    33

    +4.0 · category avg 41

  7. 07

    Customer Documentation

    Weight 8%

    52

    +4.2 · category avg 57

Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 49 Candidate sourcing AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.

Total weighted score: 36.8(rounded to 37 for display)

§ 03 - Strongest · weakest

Strongest category

Customer Documentation

Raw score 52 · contributes 4.2 to total.

52 against a 57 category average

Weakest category

Bias Audit Transparency

Raw score 22 · contributes 4.0 to total.

22 against a 47 category average

§ 04 - Cited evidence

Download diligence record

§ Evidence

Cited per category

Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.

Evidence ledger

Items
18
Documentation
8
Public statement
3
Product feature
1
Absence
6
With a source URL
12 of 18
Source hostnames
1
Fewest items
2
Bias Audit Transparency

These figures measure how thoroughly AmazingHiring was reviewed, not how AmazingHiring performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.

Article 11 Technical Documentation

3 items35

Bias Audit Transparency

2 items22

FRIA Support

2 items30

Data Governance Disclosure

3 items50

Human Oversight Design

2 items48

Post-Market Monitoring

3 items33

Customer Documentation

3 items52

§ 05 - Editorial notes

§ Regulatory frame

What applies to candidate sourcing ai.

Ranking outputs are inside Annex III §4 when they influence hiring decisions. GDPR Article 22 (automated decision-making) and the GDPR rights around profiling apply independently for EU candidates.

§ Others rated in Candidate sourcing AI

All sourcing vendors

Ranked 43 of 49 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.

  1. 40Personio40F
  2. 41Fetcher37F
  3. 42Loxo37F
  4. 43AmazingHiringThis profile37F
  5. 44Turing36F
  6. 45Ceipal35F

Conflicts of interest

No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.

Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.