Codility
Codility is a technical/coding assessment platform that screens and interviews software engineers with work-sample coding tests, live technical interviews, and integrity tooling including plagiarism and AI-use detection.
§ 01 — Score breakdown
§ Score breakdown
Category scoring
Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.
- 01
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20%60
+12.0
- 02
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18%45
+8.1
- 03
FRIA Support
Weight 15%42
+6.3
- 04
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15%57
+8.5
- 05
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12%62
+7.4
- 06
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12%50
+6.0
- 07
Customer Documentation
Weight 8%66
+5.3
§ 02 — Strongest · weakest
Strongest category
Customer Documentation
Raw score 66 · contributes 5.3 to total.
Weakest category
FRIA Support
Raw score 42 · contributes 6.3 to total.
§ 03 — Cited evidence
Download diligence record→§ Evidence
Cited per category
Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence.
§ 04 — Editorial notes
Company overview
Codility (Codility Limited), founded in 2009 by competitive-programmer Greg Jakacki and headquartered in London with engineering and product teams in Warsaw, is a technical hiring platform. Its products — Screen (work-sample coding assessments), Interview (live technical interviews, including an AI Copilot), and Skills Intelligence — are built around I/O-psychology methodology, deterministic auditable scoring, and integrity controls (identity verification, behavioral monitoring, cheating-app and plagiarism/AI-code detection). The company advertises SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance, and WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, with EU/US data residency on AWS.
Regulatory exposure
Assessment tools used to substantially assist employment decisions fall under EU AI Act Annex III (high-risk), NYC Local Law 144 (AEDTs), and emerging Illinois/Colorado AI laws, and Codility markets directly to EU and NYC employers. Codility's stated posture reduces some exposure: it says no AI or machine learning makes an automated hiring decision, scoring and integrity risk levels are deterministic and rule-based, and a human always decides — which is designed to keep tools outside the strictest AEDT/Article-22 automated-decision triggers. However, deployer obligations (bias audit, human oversight, transparency, adverse-impact monitoring) still attach to customers, and Codility's own EU AI Act alignment is described as a roadmap ahead of the August 2026 deadline rather than completed conformity.
Path to a higher score
The largest gaps are independent, published bias evidence and formal AI-Act artifacts. Codility could raise its score by commissioning and publicly posting an independent third-party bias/NYC LL 144 audit (e.g., BABL AI, Warden AI, Holistic AI) rather than customer-specific analyses gated in its Technical Manual; publishing the Technical Manual and adverse-impact methodology; releasing a model card for its AI-detection and AI-Assistant components; pursuing ISO 42001; and providing an EU AI Act Article 27 Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template and completed conformity documentation for deployers.
Conflicts of interest
No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework — the consulting firm that operates this directory — provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.
Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.