HomeCompare365Talents vs Avionté

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

365Talents vs Avionté

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

365Talents takes the total, Avionté takes more of the criteria.

365Talents (Sourcing) edges Avionté (ATS-integrated) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 46 to 45. Avionté leads more of the criteria than 365Talents — 4 to 2 — but Article 11 Technical Documentation, which 365Talents leads, carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum still falls to 365Talents. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (365Talents 63, Avionté 50) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 85% of the weighted advantage 365Talents holds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Avionté under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only 365Talents is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

Record365TalentsAvionté
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersFRUS
Founded20152005

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    365Talents 63 · Avionté 50

    2.6 weighted points to 365Talents

  2. 18% weight · 71% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    365Talents 18 · Avionté 22

    0.7 weighted points to Avionté

  3. 15% weight · 81% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    365Talents 58 · Avionté 55

    0.4 weighted points to 365Talents

  4. 8% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    365Talents 57 · Avionté 62

    0.4 weighted points to Avionté

  5. 12% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    365Talents 57 · Avionté 60

    0.4 weighted points to Avionté

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    365Talents 44 · Avionté 45

    0.1 weighted points to Avionté

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 4.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is 365Talents minus Avionté.

CategoryWeight365TalentsAviontéΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6350+13+2.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%1822-4-0.7
FRIA Support15%3535--
Data Governance Disclosure15%5855+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5760-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4445-1-0.1
Customer Documentation8%5762-5-0.4
Total100%46 (F)45 (F)+1+1.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeight365TalentsAvionté
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%317Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain276Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Avionté has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Avionté sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 71 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 33 for Avionté, across 4 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
365Talents last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Avionté last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.