§ The result
Checkr leads 365Talents by 8 points.
Checkr scores 54 and 365Talents 46 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the Screening and Sourcing cohorts. Checkr leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while 365Talents leads 1, including FRIA Support. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (365Talents 18, Checkr 35) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 40% of the weighted advantage Checkr holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Vendor profile
Checkr
Checkr is an FCRA-regulated background screening platform that uses machine learning to parse, classify and standardize criminal, employment, education and motor-vehicle records, and to route them through customer-configured adjudication rulesets that flag candidates as eligible, review or escalated for employment decisions.
§ The record
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Checkr under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only 365Talents is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | 365Talents | Checkr |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | FR | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 37% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
365Talents 18 · Checkr 35
3.1 weighted points to Checkr
20% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
365Talents 63 · Checkr 70
1.4 weighted points to Checkr
12% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
365Talents 57 · Checkr 66
1.1 weighted points to Checkr
8% weight · 78% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
365Talents 57 · Checkr 68
0.9 weighted points to Checkr
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
365Talents 44 · Checkr 50
0.7 weighted points to Checkr
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
365Talents 58 · Checkr 62
0.6 weighted points to Checkr
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
365Talents 35 · Checkr 32
0.4 weighted points to 365Talents
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -7.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -7.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus Checkr.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | Checkr | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 70 | -7 | -1.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 35 | -17 | -3.1 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 32 | +3 | +0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 62 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 66 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 50 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 68 | -11 | -0.9 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 54 (F) | -8 | -7.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | Checkr | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 2 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 24 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Checkr has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 66 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 28 for Checkr, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Checkr last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next