§ The result
Dayforce leads 365Talents on all 7 criteria.
Dayforce, filed under ATS-integrated, comes out 11 points above 365Talents, filed under Sourcing: 57 against 46 under rubric v1.0. Dayforce leads every one of the 7 criteria, 365Talents none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Post-Market Monitoring, 365Talents 44 to Dayforce 47. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — 365Talents 18, Dayforce 42 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Dayforce holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Vendor profile
Dayforce
Dayforce is an enterprise human capital management platform whose Dayforce Recruiting module uses AI to assign letter grades to external job applicants, generate job descriptions, and automate screening and hiring workflows alongside HR, payroll, time, talent, and analytics.
§ The record
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Dayforce under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only 365Talents is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | 365Talents | Dayforce |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | FR | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 1992 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 40% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
365Talents 18 · Dayforce 42
4.3 weighted points to Dayforce
20% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
365Talents 63 · Dayforce 74
2.2 weighted points to Dayforce
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
365Talents 57 · Dayforce 68
1.3 weighted points to Dayforce
8% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
365Talents 57 · Dayforce 70
1.0 weighted points to Dayforce
15% weight · 90% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
365Talents 35 · Dayforce 40
0.8 weighted points to Dayforce
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
365Talents 58 · Dayforce 63
0.8 weighted points to Dayforce
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
365Talents 44 · Dayforce 47
0.4 weighted points to Dayforce
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -11 beside that -10.7.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus Dayforce.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | Dayforce | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 74 | -11 | -2.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 42 | -24 | -4.3 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 40 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 63 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 68 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 47 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 70 | -13 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 57 (F) | -11 | -10.7 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | Dayforce | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 28 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Dayforce has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 34 for Dayforce, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Dayforce last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next