§ The result
Greenhouse leads 365Talents on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Greenhouse (ATS-integrated) opens a 21-point lead on 365Talents (Sourcing), 67 (D) to 46 (F). Of the 7 criteria 365Talents wins none, and the narrowest lead Greenhouse holds is on Data Governance Disclosure, 365Talents 58 to Greenhouse 64. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — 365Talents 18, Greenhouse 86 — and at an 18% weight it carries 60% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
365Talents
365Talents is an AI skills-intelligence and internal talent-marketplace platform that infers employees' skills from HRIS records, CVs, documents and collaboration tools, then matches them to internal jobs, projects, gigs, mentors, learning and succession pipelines.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144 and Illinois HB 3773. Only 365Talents is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | 365Talents | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | FR | US |
| Founded | 2015 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
365Talents 18 · Greenhouse 86
12.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
20% weight · 74% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
365Talents 63 · Greenhouse 78
3.0 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 82% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
365Talents 44 · Greenhouse 58
1.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 88% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
365Talents 57 · Greenhouse 66
1.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
365Talents 35 · Greenhouse 42
1.1 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
365Talents 58 · Greenhouse 64
0.9 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
365Talents 57 · Greenhouse 64
0.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -20.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is 365Talents minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | 365Talents | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 63 | 78 | -15 | -3.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 18 | 86 | -68 | -12.2 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 42 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 58 | 64 | -6 | -0.9 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 57 | 66 | -9 | -1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 44 | 58 | -14 | -1.7 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 57 | 64 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 67 (D) | -21 | -20.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | 365Talents | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | — | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 31 | 7 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 55 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- 365Talents last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next