HomeCompare365Talents vs Tenzo AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

365Talents vs Tenzo AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Tenzo AI leads 365Talents by 10 points.

Tenzo AI, filed under Screening, comes out 10 points above 365Talents, filed under Sourcing: 56 against 46 under rubric v1.0. Tenzo AI leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while 365Talents leads 2, including Article 11 Technical Documentation. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — 365Talents 18, Tenzo AI 83 — and at an 18% weight it carries 88% of the weighted advantage Tenzo AI holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

365Talents is filed under Candidate sourcing AI, Tenzo AI under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.

Record365TalentsTenzo AI
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersFRUS
Founded20152024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 67% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    365Talents 18 · Tenzo AI 83

    11.7 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  2. 20% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    365Talents 63 · Tenzo AI 45

    3.6 weighted points to 365Talents

  3. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    365Talents 35 · Tenzo AI 40

    0.8 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  4. 15% weight · 95% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    365Talents 58 · Tenzo AI 55

    0.4 weighted points to 365Talents

  5. 8% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    365Talents 57 · Tenzo AI 62

    0.4 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    365Talents 57 · Tenzo AI 60

    0.4 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    365Talents 44 · Tenzo AI 45

    0.1 weighted points to Tenzo AI

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is 365Talents minus Tenzo AI.

CategoryWeight365TalentsTenzo AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6345+18+3.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%1883-65-11.7
FRIA Support15%3540-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%5855+3+0.4
Human Oversight Design12%5760-3-0.4
Post-Market Monitoring12%4445-1-0.1
Customer Documentation8%5762-5-0.4
Total100%46 (F)56 (F)-10-9.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeight365TalentsTenzo AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31—41Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%61Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%51Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%317Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain304Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

365Talents has 38 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 31 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Tenzo AI has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Tenzo AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 38 for 365Talents, across 3 distinct source domains, and 34 for Tenzo AI, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
365Talents last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tenzo AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.