§ The result
4 points separate Adaface and Aon Assessment.
Under rubric v1.0, Adaface and Aon Assessment finish 4 points apart, 39 to 35, as two Assessment entries. Aon Assessment takes 2 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 5 for Adaface, whose share includes Data Governance Disclosure. The advantage Adaface holds is spread out: Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Adaface 52, Aon Assessment 38, 15% weight), yet it supplies only 36% of the weighted points Adaface gains across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Adaface
Adaface runs chatbot-led 'conversational' skills tests for 500+ roles that score candidates automatically as pass, borderline pass or fail on benchmarked scorecards, backed by webcam, screen and IP proctoring and an AI résumé parser.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
§ The record
Adaface and Aon Assessment are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Adaface | Aon Assessment |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | SG | DE |
| Founded | 2018 | 2002 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Adaface 52 · Aon Assessment 38
2.1 weighted points to Adaface
12% weight · 48% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Adaface 38 · Aon Assessment 25
1.6 weighted points to Adaface
18% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Adaface 22 · Aon Assessment 30
1.4 weighted points to Aon Assessment
8% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Adaface 58 · Aon Assessment 48
0.8 weighted points to Adaface
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Adaface 30 · Aon Assessment 25
0.8 weighted points to Adaface
12% weight · 95% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Adaface 50 · Aon Assessment 45
0.6 weighted points to Adaface
20% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Adaface 38 · Aon Assessment 40
0.4 weighted points to Aon Assessment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +4.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.6 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +4 beside that +4.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Adaface minus Aon Assessment.
| Category | Weight | Adaface | Aon Assessment | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 38 | 40 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 30 | -8 | -1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 52 | 38 | +14 | +2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 50 | 45 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 25 | +13 | +1.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 48 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 39 (F) | 35 (F) | +4 | +4.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Adaface | Aon Assessment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | — |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 25 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Adaface has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Adaface, across 1 distinct source domain, and 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Adaface last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next