HomeCompareAdaface vs Recruitee

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Adaface vs Recruitee

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

3 points separate Recruitee and Adaface.

Recruitee (ATS-integrated) edges Adaface (Assessment) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 42 to 39. The 7 criteria split 4 to 1 in favour of Recruitee, with 2 level: Recruitee is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Adaface on FRIA Support. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Adaface 22, Recruitee 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 42% of the weighted advantage Recruitee holds across the 4 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Adaface is filed under Assessment AI, Recruitee under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Adaface is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordAdafaceRecruitee
Price tierLowMid
HeadquartersSGNL
Founded20182015

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Adaface 22 · Recruitee 30

    1.4 weighted points to Recruitee

  2. 12% weight · 62% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Adaface 50 · Recruitee 58

    1.0 weighted points to Recruitee

  3. 20% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Adaface 38 · Recruitee 42

    0.8 weighted points to Recruitee

  4. 15% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Adaface 30 · Recruitee 27

    0.4 weighted points to Adaface

  5. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Adaface 38 · Recruitee 40

    0.2 weighted points to Recruitee

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -3.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -3 beside that -3.0.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Adaface minus Recruitee.

CategoryWeightAdafaceRecruiteeΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%3842-4-0.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%2230-8-1.4
FRIA Support15%3027+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5252--
Human Oversight Design12%5058-8-1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%39 (F)42 (F)-3-3.0

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAdafaceRecruitee
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21—11—
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%256Sources on the vendor's own domain147Sources on the vendor's own domain

Adaface has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruitee has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 14 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 31 for Adaface, across 1 distinct source domain, and 21 for Recruitee, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Adaface last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Recruitee last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.