HomeCompareADP vs Jobvite

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

ADP vs Jobvite

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

3 points separate ADP and Jobvite.

Within the ATS-integrated cohort, ADP edges Jobvite by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 48 to 45. ADP leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Jobvite leads 1, including FRIA Support, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — ADP 46, Jobvite 38 — and at an 18% weight it carries 45% of the weighted advantage ADP holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

ADP and Jobvite are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordADPJobvite
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19492006

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 41% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    ADP 46 · Jobvite 38

    1.4 weighted points to ADP

  2. 12% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    ADP 45 · Jobvite 38

    0.8 weighted points to ADP

  3. 20% weight · 83% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    ADP 53 · Jobvite 50

    0.6 weighted points to ADP

  4. 15% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    ADP 28 · Jobvite 30

    0.3 weighted points to Jobvite

  5. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    ADP 57 · Jobvite 55

    0.3 weighted points to ADP

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to +2.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +2.9.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is ADP minus Jobvite.

CategoryWeightADPJobviteΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5350+3+0.6
Bias Audit Transparency18%4638+8+1.4
FRIA Support15%2830-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%5755+2+0.3
Human Oversight Design12%5555--
Post-Market Monitoring12%4538+7+0.8
Customer Documentation8%5858--
Total100%48 (F)45 (F)+3+2.9

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightADPJobvite
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain12
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%30Sources on the vendor's own domain20
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
All criteria100%185Sources on the vendor's own domain155Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

ADP has 23 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 18 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; Jobvite has 19 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Jobvite sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 23 for ADP, across 2 distinct source domains, and 19 for Jobvite, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
ADP last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Jobvite last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.