§ The result
3 points separate Aon Assessment and Arena Analytics.
Aon Assessment (Assessment) edges Arena Analytics (Screening) by 3 points under rubric v1.0, 35 to 32. The 7 criteria split 4 to 2 in favour of Aon Assessment, with 1 level: Aon Assessment is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and Arena Analytics on Data Governance Disclosure. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Aon Assessment 40, Arena Analytics 30) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 44% of the weighted advantage Aon Assessment holds across the 4 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Arena Analytics
Arena scores job applicants, mainly for healthcare and senior-living employers, on how likely they are to show up and stay in a specific role at a specific location, reroutes and sources candidates it rates likely to be retained, and applies the same outcome models to employee flight risk and internal mobility.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Arena Analytics under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Arena Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Arena Analytics 30
2.0 weighted points to Aon Assessment
18% weight · 53% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Arena Analytics 25
0.9 weighted points to Aon Assessment
12% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Arena Analytics 38
0.8 weighted points to Aon Assessment
8% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Arena Analytics 38
0.8 weighted points to Aon Assessment
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Arena Analytics 42
0.6 weighted points to Arena Analytics
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Arena Analytics 28
0.4 weighted points to Arena Analytics
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +3.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +3 beside that +3.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Arena Analytics.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Arena Analytics | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 25 | +5 | +0.9 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 42 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 38 | +7 | +0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 38 | +10 | +0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 32 (F) | +3 | +3.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Arena Analytics | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and Arena Analytics sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 47 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Arena Analytics last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next