§ The result
Avionté leads Aon Assessment by 10 points.
Avionté sits 10 points above Aon Assessment under rubric v1.0 — 45 against 35 — with Avionté filed under ATS-integrated and Aon Assessment under Assessment. Aon Assessment takes 1 of the 7 criteria, Bias Audit Transparency among them, against 6 for Avionté, whose share includes Data Governance Disclosure. Post-Market Monitoring is the widest raw gap (Aon Assessment 25, Avionté 45) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Aon Assessment 38, Avionté 55), 22% of the weighted advantage Avionté builds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Avionté
AviontéBOLD is a front- and back-office platform for staffing agencies (ATS/CRM, onboarding, payroll and billing): its AI Matching Agent ranks candidates already in an agency's database for each job, and its Claude-powered PIXEL chatbot pre-screens and scores applicants.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Avionté under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Avionté |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2005 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 20% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Avionté 55
2.5 weighted points to Avionté
12% weight · 39% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Avionté 45
2.4 weighted points to Avionté
20% weight · 54% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Avionté 50
2.0 weighted points to Avionté
12% weight · 68% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Avionté 60
1.8 weighted points to Avionté
15% weight · 80% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · Avionté 35
1.5 weighted points to Avionté
18% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Avionté 22
1.4 weighted points to Aon Assessment
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Avionté 62
1.1 weighted points to Avionté
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -9.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 12.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -9.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Avionté.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Avionté | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 50 | -10 | -2.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 22 | +8 | +1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 45 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 62 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 45 (F) | -10 | -9.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Avionté | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Avionté has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and Avionté sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 33 for Avionté, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Avionté last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next