§ The result
BambooHR leads Aon Assessment by 8 points.
BambooHR scores 43 and Aon Assessment 35 under rubric v1.0, an 8-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. BambooHR leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Data Governance Disclosure, while Aon Assessment leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing fall on different criteria: Post-Market Monitoring (Aon Assessment 25, BambooHR 44) and Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Aon Assessment 38, BambooHR 56), the second being 32% of the weighted advantage BambooHR holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
BambooHR
A cloud HR platform for small and mid-sized businesses combining an HRIS and applicant tracking with generative AI features such as AI-drafted job descriptions and a natural-language HR data assistant.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, BambooHR under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | BambooHR |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2008 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · BambooHR 56
2.7 weighted points to BambooHR
12% weight · 57% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · BambooHR 44
2.3 weighted points to BambooHR
15% weight · 72% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · BambooHR 34
1.3 weighted points to BambooHR
8% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · BambooHR 62
1.1 weighted points to BambooHR
12% weight · 91% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · BambooHR 50
0.6 weighted points to BambooHR
20% weight · 96% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · BambooHR 42
0.4 weighted points to BambooHR
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · BambooHR 28
0.4 weighted points to Aon Assessment
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -8.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -8 beside that -8.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus BambooHR.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | BambooHR | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 42 | -2 | -0.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 28 | +2 | +0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 34 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 56 | -18 | -2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 50 | -5 | -0.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 44 | -19 | -2.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 62 | -14 | -1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 43 (F) | -8 | -8.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | BambooHR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 15 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; BambooHR has 21 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 38 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 21 for BambooHR, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- BambooHR last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next