§ The result
Harri leads Aon Assessment by 6 points.
Harri scores 41 and Aon Assessment 35 under rubric v1.0, a 6-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Assessment cohorts. Harri leads 5 of the 7 criteria, including FRIA Support, while Aon Assessment leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency. FRIA Support is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 25, Harri 44, 15% weight), but it accounts for only 33% of the weighted advantage Harri holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Harri
Harri is a frontline workforce platform for hospitality, grocery and care employers whose pre-hire suite pairs a career portal and applicant tracking system with Carri, a conversational AI assistant that screens applicants and coordinates interviews, plus an agentic AI layer (Salli) for scheduling and labor-law compliance.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Harri under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Harri |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | DE | US |
| Founded | 2002 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 26% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · Harri 44
2.9 weighted points to Harri
15% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Harri 52
2.1 weighted points to Harri
12% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Harri 40
1.8 weighted points to Harri
18% weight · 75% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Harri 22
1.4 weighted points to Aon Assessment
20% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Harri 35
1.0 weighted points to Aon Assessment
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Harri 60
1.0 weighted points to Harri
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Harri 52
0.8 weighted points to Harri
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -6.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -6.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Harri.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Harri | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 35 | +5 | +1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 22 | +8 | +1.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 44 | -19 | -2.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 52 | -14 | -2.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 52 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 40 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 60 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 41 (F) | -6 | -6.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Harri | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 19 | 8 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Harri has 27 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 19 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 44 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 27 for Harri, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Harri last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next