§ The result
iMocha leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.
iMocha finishes 21 points clear of Aon Assessment inside the Assessment cohort under rubric v1.0: 56 against 35. iMocha leads every one of the 7 criteria and 3 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Aon Assessment leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Aon Assessment 40, iMocha 68, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 27% of the weighted advantage iMocha holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
Aon Assessment and iMocha are both filed under Assessment AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Video interview and Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | DE | IN |
| Founded | 2002 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 27% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · iMocha 68
5.6 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 47% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · iMocha 66
4.2 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · iMocha 48
2.8 weighted points to iMocha
18% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · iMocha 44
2.5 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · iMocha 64
2.3 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · iMocha 38
1.9 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · iMocha 66
1.4 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -20.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 20.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -21 beside that -20.8.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 68 | -28 | -5.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 44 | -14 | -2.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 66 | -28 | -4.2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 64 | -19 | -2.3 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 48 | -23 | -2.8 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 66 | -18 | -1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 56 (F) | -21 | -20.8 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next