§ The result
Recruitly leads Aon Assessment by 6 points.
Under rubric v1.0, Recruitly, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 41 and Aon Assessment, filed under Assessment, on 35, 6 points apart. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Recruitly: Recruitly is ahead on Post-Market Monitoring and Aon Assessment on Bias Audit Transparency. The heaviest weighted swing runs the other way — Aon Assessment takes Bias Audit Transparency at 18%, Aon Assessment 30 to Recruitly 15, 100% of the weighted advantage Aon Assessment holds — while the widest raw gap sits on Post-Market Monitoring, Aon Assessment 25 to Recruitly 45.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Recruitly
Recruitly is an all-in-one ATS and CRM for recruitment agencies. It includes AI candidate matching, which ranks candidates against live jobs and shows its reasons, and AI application review, which scores and explains each applicant against the job spec. It also offers external profile sourcing, CV parsing, an AI phone system and an AI meeting assistant.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Recruitly under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Aon Assessment is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Recruitly |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Low |
| Headquarters | DE | AE |
| Founded | 2002 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 24% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Recruitly 15
2.7 weighted points to Aon Assessment
12% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Recruitly 45
2.4 weighted points to Recruitly
12% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Recruitly 60
1.8 weighted points to Recruitly
15% weight · 75% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · Recruitly 35
1.5 weighted points to Recruitly
15% weight · 84% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Recruitly 45
1.1 weighted points to Recruitly
20% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Recruitly 45
1.0 weighted points to Recruitly
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Recruitly 58
0.8 weighted points to Recruitly
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -5.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -6 beside that -5.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Recruitly.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Recruitly | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 45 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 15 | +15 | +2.7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 35 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 45 | -7 | -1.1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 60 | -15 | -1.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 45 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 58 | -10 | -0.8 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 41 (F) | -6 | -5.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Recruitly | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 32 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Recruitly has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 37 for Recruitly, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Recruitly last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next