§ The result
Tengai leads Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria.
Tengai scores 42 and Aon Assessment 35 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Screening and Assessment cohorts. Tengai is ahead of Aon Assessment on all 7 criteria but on none of them by as much as 20 raw points, the closest being Bias Audit Transparency at Aon Assessment 30 to Tengai 33. Human Oversight Design is the widest raw gap (Aon Assessment 45, Tengai 58) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Data Governance Disclosure at 15% (Aon Assessment 38, Tengai 50), 26% of the weighted advantage Tengai builds across the 7 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Aon Assessment
Aon Assessment Solutions (formerly cut-e) provides enterprise pre-hire psychometric assessments - ability, personality (ADEPT-15), situational-judgement, gamified cognitive (smartPredict/gridChallenge) tests and an AI-scored video interview tool (vidAssess-AI) - used to screen and rank job applicants at scale.
Vendor profile
Tengai
Tengai runs structured screening interviews through a browser-based AI avatar and combines candidates' yes/no qualification answers, a Five-Factor-based personality score and recruiter ratings of open answers into an automatically ranked shortlist.
§ The record
Aon Assessment is filed under Assessment AI, Tengai under Screening AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Video interview.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Aon Assessment | Tengai |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | DE | SE |
| Founded | 2002 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
15% weight · 26% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Aon Assessment 38 · Tengai 50
1.8 weighted points to Tengai
12% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Aon Assessment 45 · Tengai 58
1.6 weighted points to Tengai
20% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Aon Assessment 40 · Tengai 45
1.0 weighted points to Tengai
12% weight · 77% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Aon Assessment 25 · Tengai 33
1.0 weighted points to Tengai
8% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Aon Assessment 48 · Tengai 55
0.6 weighted points to Tengai
18% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Aon Assessment 30 · Tengai 33
0.5 weighted points to Tengai
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Aon Assessment 25 · Tengai 28
0.4 weighted points to Tengai
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -6.9 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.9 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -6.9.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Aon Assessment minus Tengai.
| Category | Weight | Aon Assessment | Tengai | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 40 | 45 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 30 | 33 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 28 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 38 | 50 | -12 | -1.8 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 45 | 58 | -13 | -1.6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 25 | 33 | -8 | -1.0 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 48 | 55 | -7 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 35 (F) | 42 (F) | -7 | -6.9 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Aon Assessment | Tengai | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 7 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 1 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 11 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 37 | 5 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Aon Assessment has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Tengai has 42 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 37 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Aon Assessment and Tengai sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 17 for Aon Assessment, across 3 distinct source domains, and 42 for Tengai, across 4 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Aon Assessment last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Tengai last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next