§ The result
Greenhouse leads Apriora (Alex) on all 7 criteria.
Greenhouse sits 10 points above Apriora (Alex) under rubric v1.0 — 67 (D) against 57 (F) — with Greenhouse filed under ATS-integrated and Apriora (Alex) under Video interview. Greenhouse leads every one of the 7 criteria, Apriora (Alex) none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, Apriora (Alex) 62 to Greenhouse 64. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Apriora (Alex) 52, Greenhouse 78 — and at a 20% weight it carries 52% of the weighted advantage Greenhouse holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Apriora (Alex)
Apriora's product "Alex" is an agentic AI recruiter whose live voice/video interviewer conducts real-time conversational interviews with candidates, asks dynamic follow-ups, and returns role-fit scores, transcripts, and fraud flags to the hiring team.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ The record
Apriora (Alex) is filed under Video interview AI, Greenhouse under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, EU AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Apriora (Alex) is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Apriora (Alex) | Greenhouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2023 | 2012 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 52% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Apriora (Alex) 52 · Greenhouse 78
5.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Apriora (Alex) 54 · Greenhouse 64
1.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Apriora (Alex) 47 · Greenhouse 58
1.3 weighted points to Greenhouse
12% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Apriora (Alex) 60 · Greenhouse 66
0.7 weighted points to Greenhouse
15% weight · 93% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Apriora (Alex) 38 · Greenhouse 42
0.6 weighted points to Greenhouse
18% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Apriora (Alex) 83 · Greenhouse 86
0.5 weighted points to Greenhouse
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Apriora (Alex) 62 · Greenhouse 64
0.2 weighted points to Greenhouse
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -10.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -10 beside that -10.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Apriora (Alex) minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Apriora (Alex) | Greenhouse | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 52 | 78 | -26 | -5.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 83 | 86 | -3 | -0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 38 | 42 | -4 | -0.6 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 54 | 64 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 47 | 58 | -11 | -1.3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 64 | -2 | -0.2 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 67 (D) | -10 | -10.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Apriora (Alex) | Greenhouse | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 16 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 16 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Apriora (Alex) has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Greenhouse has 17 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 1 documented absence; some documentation or audit rows for Apriora (Alex) and Greenhouse sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 39 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for Apriora (Alex), across 2 distinct source domains, and 17 for Greenhouse, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Apriora (Alex) last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Greenhouse last reviewed
- June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next