Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arctic Shores vs Fountain
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks — covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility — rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
Fountain
AI-powered high-volume hiring platform that automates sourcing, applicant screening (including a voice-based AI Recruiter), interview scheduling, and onboarding for frontline workforces.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus Fountain.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | Fountain | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 50 | — |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 30 | +5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 30 | +5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 55 | +2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 58 | -2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 52 | +12 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 44 (F) | +2 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Arctic Shores
34 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 20
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 7
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Fountain
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- absence
- 6
- public statement
- 3