Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arctic Shores vs Greenhouse
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks — covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility — rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
Greenhouse
End-to-end applicant tracking system and structured-hiring platform, now layered with 'Greenhouse AI' features such as resume parsing, Talent Matching, and interview summarisation.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus Greenhouse.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | Greenhouse | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 78 | -28 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 86 | -51 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 42 | -7 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 64 | -7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 66 | -10 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 58 | -28 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 64 | — |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 67 (D) | -21 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Arctic Shores
34 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 20
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 7
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Greenhouse
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- public statement
- 3
- audit report
- 2
- absence
- 1