Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arctic Shores vs HiringBranch
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks — covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility — rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
HiringBranch
HiringBranch is an AI skills-assessment platform that measures 50+ communication and soft skills from candidates' open-ended, conversational job-simulation responses (text and voice) to screen and rank applicants for customer-facing roles.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus HiringBranch.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | HiringBranch | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 60 | -10 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 60 | -25 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 35 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 55 | +2 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 52 | +4 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 40 | -10 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 64 | — |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 52 (F) | -6 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Arctic Shores
34 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 20
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 7
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
HiringBranch
19 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 11
- absence
- 6
- audit report
- 1
- public statement
- 1