Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arctic Shores vs iCIMS
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks — covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility — rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
iCIMS
Enterprise talent-acquisition / applicant tracking platform (the iCIMS Talent Cloud) that adds optional AI features — Candidate Ranking, Talent Match, and a GPT-powered Copilot — to source, rank, and engage candidates.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus iCIMS.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | iCIMS | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 58 | -8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 68 | -33 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 38 | -3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 56 | +1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 58 | -2 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 42 | -12 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 62 | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 55 (F) | -9 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Arctic Shores
34 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 20
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 7
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
iCIMS
24 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 16
- audit report
- 3
- public statement
- 2
- absence
- 3