Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arctic Shores vs Sapia.ai
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks — covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility — rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
Sapia.ai
Structured, text-based chat interview that scores candidates on personality (HEXACO) and competency traits — with no video, audio, or demographic data used.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus Sapia.ai.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | Sapia.ai | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 70 | -20 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 52 | -17 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 35 | — |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 62 | -5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 62 | -6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 50 | -20 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 62 | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 56 (F) | -10 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Arctic Shores
34 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 20
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 7
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Sapia.ai
20 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 14
- absence
- 4
- audit report
- 2