Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arctic Shores vs Turing
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks — covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility — rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
Turing
Turing is an AI-powered talent platform that vets software engineers through automated multi-stage technical assessments and uses machine-learned ranking to score, match, and place them with client companies.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus Turing.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | Turing | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 42 | +8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 28 | +7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 44 | +13 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 45 | +11 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 27 | +3 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 48 | +16 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 36 (F) | +10 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Arctic Shores
34 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 20
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 7
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Turing
14 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 6
- absence
- 7
- public statement
- 1