Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0
Arctic Shores vs Workable
Side-by-side scores and evidence under the HireAIScore rubric v1.0. Click a vendor name to jump to the full profile and the cited evidence behind each score.
Export comparison (CSV)Pro→Vendor profile
Arctic Shores
Arctic Shores sells a task-based psychometric assessment platform ("Una") that scores candidates on behaviour captured during short interactive tasks — covering personality, workplace intelligence and learning agility — rather than self-report questionnaires or CV review.
Vendor profile
Workable
Workable is an all-in-one applicant tracking system and HR platform whose AI feature layer (Workable AI / Workable Agent) sources, screens, scores, and matches candidates and drafts recruiting content within the recruiting workflow.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arctic Shores minus Workable.
| Category | Weight | Arctic Shores | Workable | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 55 | -5 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 35 | 42 | -7 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 25 | +10 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 57 | 58 | -1 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 56 | 62 | -6 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 30 | 42 | -12 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 64 | 56 | +8 |
| Total | 100% | 46 (F) | 48 (F) | -2 |
§ Evidence summary
Evidence count
Arctic Shores
34 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 20
- public statement
- 6
- absence
- 7
- integration
- 1
Evidence count
Workable
17 rows across 7 categories
- documentation
- 10
- public statement
- 1
- absence
- 6