§ The result
DevSkiller leads Arena Analytics by 7 points.
DevSkiller scores 39 and Arena Analytics 32 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of DevSkiller, with 1 level: DevSkiller is ahead on Human Oversight Design and Arena Analytics on Bias Audit Transparency. Customer Documentation is the widest raw gap (Arena Analytics 38, DevSkiller 58) but not the heaviest weighted swing, which is Human Oversight Design at 12% (Arena Analytics 38, DevSkiller 55), 27% of the weighted advantage DevSkiller builds across the 5 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Arena Analytics
Arena scores job applicants, mainly for healthcare and senior-living employers, on how likely they are to show up and stay in a specific role at a specific location, reroutes and sources candidates it rates likely to be retained, and applies the same outcome models to employee flight risk and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
DevSkiller
DevSkiller (now branded SkillPanel) provides technical skills assessment and coding tests that automatically score developer candidates on real-world work-sample tasks using hidden verification unit tests and static code analysis.
§ The record
Arena Analytics is filed under Screening AI, DevSkiller under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arena Analytics | DevSkiller |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | PL |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
12% weight · 25% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arena Analytics 38 · DevSkiller 55
2.0 weighted points to DevSkiller
8% weight · 45% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arena Analytics 38 · DevSkiller 58
1.6 weighted points to DevSkiller
15% weight · 63% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arena Analytics 42 · DevSkiller 52
1.5 weighted points to DevSkiller
12% weight · 81% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arena Analytics 28 · DevSkiller 40
1.4 weighted points to DevSkiller
20% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arena Analytics 30 · DevSkiller 35
1.0 weighted points to DevSkiller
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arena Analytics 25 · DevSkiller 22
0.5 weighted points to Arena Analytics
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -7.0 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 8.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -7 beside that -7.0.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arena Analytics minus DevSkiller.
| Category | Weight | Arena Analytics | DevSkiller | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -1.0 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 22 | +3 | +0.5 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 25 | - | - |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 52 | -10 | -1.5 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 38 | 55 | -17 | -2.0 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 40 | -12 | -1.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 58 | -20 | -1.6 |
| Total | 100% | 32 (F) | 39 (F) | -7 | -7.0 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arena Analytics | DevSkiller | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 1 | — |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 0 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 11 | 4 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; DevSkiller has 15 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 11 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics and DevSkiller sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 45 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 15 for DevSkiller, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arena Analytics last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- DevSkiller last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next