§ The result
iMocha leads Arena Analytics on all 7 criteria.
iMocha finishes 24 points clear of Arena Analytics under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 32 — across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. iMocha leads every one of the 7 criteria and 5 of them by 20 raw points or more, Article 11 Technical Documentation among them; Arena Analytics leads none. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Arena Analytics 30, iMocha 68, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 31% of the weighted advantage iMocha holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Arena Analytics
Arena scores job applicants, mainly for healthcare and senior-living employers, on how likely they are to show up and stay in a specific role at a specific location, reroutes and sources candidates it rates likely to be retained, and applies the same outcome models to employee flight risk and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
iMocha
iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment and skills-intelligence platform that evaluates candidates and employees across technical, cognitive, coding, and soft skills for hiring and internal talent management, including AI-based coding simulators and an AI video interviewer (Tara).
§ The record
Arena Analytics is filed under Screening AI, iMocha under Assessment AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act, Illinois HB 3773 and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Arena Analytics | iMocha |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Enterprise | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | IN |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 31% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Arena Analytics 30 · iMocha 68
7.6 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 46% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Arena Analytics 42 · iMocha 66
3.6 weighted points to iMocha
18% weight · 60% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Arena Analytics 25 · iMocha 44
3.4 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Arena Analytics 38 · iMocha 64
3.1 weighted points to iMocha
12% weight · 83% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Arena Analytics 28 · iMocha 48
2.4 weighted points to iMocha
8% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Arena Analytics 38 · iMocha 66
2.2 weighted points to iMocha
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Arena Analytics 25 · iMocha 38
1.9 weighted points to iMocha
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -24.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -24 beside that -24.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Arena Analytics minus iMocha.
| Category | Weight | Arena Analytics | iMocha | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 30 | 68 | -38 | -7.6 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 44 | -19 | -3.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 25 | 38 | -13 | -1.9 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 42 | 66 | -24 | -3.6 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 38 | 64 | -26 | -3.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 28 | 48 | -20 | -2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 38 | 66 | -28 | -2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 32 (F) | 56 (F) | -24 | -24.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Arena Analytics | iMocha | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 2 | 1 | — | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 21 | 5 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Arena Analytics has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; iMocha has 26 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 21 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Arena Analytics and iMocha sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 56 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 30 for Arena Analytics, across 3 distinct source domains, and 26 for iMocha, across 2 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Arena Analytics last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- iMocha last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next