HomeCompareAvature vs Humanly

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Avature vs Humanly

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Avature leads Humanly by 6 points.

Under rubric v1.0, Avature, filed under ATS-integrated, finishes on 48 and Humanly, filed under Screening, on 42, 6 points apart. Humanly takes 1 of the 7 criteria, FRIA Support among them, against 5 for Avature, whose share includes Data Governance Disclosure, and 1 is level. Data Governance Disclosure is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Avature 58, Humanly 40 — and at a 15% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage Avature holds across the 5 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Avature is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Humanly under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Humanly is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordAvatureHumanly
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20042018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 15% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Avature 58 · Humanly 40

    2.7 weighted points to Avature

  2. 20% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Avature 55 · Humanly 45

    2.0 weighted points to Avature

  3. 12% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Avature 40 · Humanly 30

    1.2 weighted points to Avature

  4. 8% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Avature 60 · Humanly 52

    0.6 weighted points to Avature

  5. 15% weight · 97% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Avature 32 · Humanly 35

    0.4 weighted points to Humanly

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Avature 60 · Humanly 58

    0.2 weighted points to Avature

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +6.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.2 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +6 beside that +6.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Avature minus Humanly.

CategoryWeightAvatureHumanlyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5545+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%4040--
FRIA Support15%3235-3-0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5840+18+2.7
Human Oversight Design12%6058+2+0.2
Post-Market Monitoring12%4030+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%6052+8+0.6
Total100%48 (F)42 (F)+6+6.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAvatureHumanly
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%21—11—
Data Governance Disclosure15%51Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%51Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%41Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%286Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain126Sources on the vendor's own domain

Avature has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Humanly has 18 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 12 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Avature sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 52 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 34 for Avature, across 3 distinct source domains, and 18 for Humanly, across 3 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Avature last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Humanly last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.