HomeCompareAvionté vs Cegid

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Avionté vs Cegid

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Avionté and Cegid tie at 45.

Avionté and Cegid, both in the ATS-integrated cohort, tie at 45 under rubric v1.0 by different routes through the criteria. Avionté leads 3 of the 7 criteria and Cegid 1, with 3 level, yet the two totals land on the same number. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Avionté 22, Cegid 30 — and at an 18% weight it carries 100% of the weighted advantage Cegid holds across the 1 criterion on that side of the table.

§ The record

Avionté and Cegid are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 2 secondary categories: Sourcing and Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordAviontéCegid
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSFR
Founded20051983

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 47% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Avionté 22 · Cegid 30

    1.4 weighted points to Cegid

  2. 12% weight · 66% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Avionté 60 · Cegid 55

    0.6 weighted points to Avionté

  3. 12% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Avionté 45 · Cegid 40

    0.6 weighted points to Avionté

  4. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Avionté 35 · Cegid 32

    0.4 weighted points to Avionté

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to +0.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Avionté minus Cegid.

CategoryWeightAviontéCegidΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5050--
Bias Audit Transparency18%2230-8-1.4
FRIA Support15%3532+3+0.4
Data Governance Disclosure15%5555--
Human Oversight Design12%6055+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4540+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%6262--
Total100%45 (F)45 (F)-+0.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAviontéCegid
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%31Sources on a separate domain61Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%61Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain61Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%276Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain336Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Avionté has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Cegid has 39 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 33 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Avionté sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 72 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Avionté, across 4 distinct source domains, and 39 for Cegid, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Avionté last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Cegid last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.