§ The result
Maki People leads Avionté on all 7 criteria.
Under rubric v1.0, Maki People (Assessment) opens a 22-point lead on Avionté (ATS-integrated), 67 (D) to 45 (F). Maki People takes all 7 criteria and Avionté none of them; the nearest contest is Human Oversight Design, Avionté 60 to Maki People 66. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Avionté 22, Maki People 80 — and at an 18% weight it carries 49% of the weighted advantage Maki People holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Avionté
AviontéBOLD is a front- and back-office platform for staffing agencies (ATS/CRM, onboarding, payroll and billing): its AI Matching Agent ranks candidates already in an agency's database for each job, and its Claude-powered PIXEL chatbot pre-screens and scores applicants.
Vendor profile
Maki People
Maki People is a Paris-based AI hiring platform whose core product is pre-hire assessment and screening of candidate skills, behaviors, and situational judgement at high volume, extended with conversational AI agents for screening, interview support, and scheduling.
§ The record
Avionté is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Maki People under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only Maki People is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Avionté | Maki People |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Enterprise |
| Headquarters | US | FR |
| Founded | 2005 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 49% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Avionté 22 · Maki People 80
10.4 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 67% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Avionté 35 · Maki People 62
4.0 weighted points to Maki People
20% weight · 80% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Avionté 50 · Maki People 64
2.8 weighted points to Maki People
15% weight · 87% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Avionté 55 · Maki People 64
1.3 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 92% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Avionté 45 · Maki People 55
1.2 weighted points to Maki People
8% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Avionté 62 · Maki People 74
1.0 weighted points to Maki People
12% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Avionté 60 · Maki People 66
0.7 weighted points to Maki People
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -21.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 21.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -22 beside that -21.5.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Avionté minus Maki People.
| Category | Weight | Avionté | Maki People | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 64 | -14 | -2.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 22 | 80 | -58 | -10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 35 | 62 | -27 | -4.0 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 64 | -9 | -1.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 60 | 66 | -6 | -0.7 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 45 | 55 | -10 | -1.2 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 62 | 74 | -12 | -1.0 |
| Total | 100% | 45 (F) | 67 (D) | -22 | -21.5 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Avionté | Maki People | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 3 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 6 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 27 | 6 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 25 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Avionté has 33 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Maki People has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 25 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Avionté and Maki People sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 64 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 33 for Avionté, across 4 distinct source domains, and 31 for Maki People, across 5 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Avionté last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Maki People last reviewed
- September 8, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next