HomeCompareBrazen vs Cornerstone OnDemand

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brazen vs Cornerstone OnDemand

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Cornerstone OnDemand leads Brazen on all 7 criteria.

Cornerstone OnDemand finishes 18 points clear of Brazen under rubric v1.0 — 56 against 38 — across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. Cornerstone OnDemand leads every one of the 7 criteria, Brazen none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Customer Documentation, Brazen 55 to Cornerstone OnDemand 60. Article 11 Technical Documentation is the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing at once (Brazen 40, Cornerstone OnDemand 72, 20% weight), but it accounts for only 37% of the weighted advantage Cornerstone OnDemand holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Brazen is filed under Screening AI, Cornerstone OnDemand under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrazenCornerstone OnDemand
Price tierEnterpriseEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20071999

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Brazen 40 · Cornerstone OnDemand 72

    6.4 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  2. 18% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Brazen 30 · Cornerstone OnDemand 58

    5.0 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  3. 15% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Brazen 45 · Cornerstone OnDemand 60

    2.3 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  4. 15% weight · 87% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Brazen 25 · Cornerstone OnDemand 35

    1.5 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  5. 12% weight · 93% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brazen 46 · Cornerstone OnDemand 55

    1.1 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  6. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Brazen 38 · Cornerstone OnDemand 45

    0.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Brazen 55 · Cornerstone OnDemand 60

    0.4 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -17.5 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 17.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -17.5.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brazen minus Cornerstone OnDemand.

CategoryWeightBrazenCornerstone OnDemandΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4072-32-6.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%3058-28-5.0
FRIA Support15%2535-10-1.5
Data Governance Disclosure15%4560-15-2.3
Human Oversight Design12%4655-9-1.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3845-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%5560-5-0.4
Total100%38 (F)56 (F)-18-17.5

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrazenCornerstone OnDemand
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1121Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0111Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%0130Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 33 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Brazen last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.