Cornerstone OnDemand
HireAIScore rates Cornerstone OnDemand 56 out of 100 (grade F, Substantial gaps) under rubric v1.0, last reviewed June 7, 2026. Cornerstone OnDemand ranks 13 of 77 vendors rated in ATS-integrated AI, against a category average of 47. That score is drawn from 20 evidence items across 7 rubric criteria for Cornerstone OnDemand — 15 with a cited source, 5 recording that nothing was located.
Score breakdown
Cornerstone OnDemand, criterion by criterion
Each rubric criterion is scored out of 100 on the cited evidence, then weighted into the total.
Weighted contribution shown to the right of each bar.
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Weight 20% · category avg 51
72
+14.4
Bias Audit Transparency
Weight 18% · category avg 41
58
+10.4
FRIA Support
Weight 15% · category avg 32
35
+5.3
Data Governance Disclosure
Weight 15% · category avg 54
60
+9.0
Human Oversight Design
Weight 12% · category avg 57
55
+6.6
Post-Market Monitoring
Weight 12% · category avg 42
45
+5.4
Customer Documentation
Weight 8% · category avg 59
60
+4.8
Total weighted score
55.9(rounded to 56 for display)
Category avg is the mean raw score on that criterion across the 77 ATS-integrated AI vendors in scope of this rubric, this one included.
Strongest criterion
Article 11 Technical Documentation
72raw / 100
Contributes 14.4 to the total. 72 against a 51 category average.
Weakest criterion
FRIA Support
35raw / 100
Contributes 5.3 to the total. 35 against a 32 category average.
Cited evidence
The evidence behind the score
Every score is backed by at least one cited piece of evidence. Open a criterion to see what was found, when, and where.
Download diligence recordEvidence ledger
- Items
- 20
- Documentation
- 11
- Audit report
- 3
- Public statement
- 1
- Absence
- 5
- With a source URL
- 15 of 20
- Source hostnames
- 3
- Fewest items
- 2
- FRIA Support
These figures measure how thoroughly Cornerstone OnDemand was reviewed, not how Cornerstone OnDemand performed — an absence row, recording that nothing was located, is counted like any other item.
Article 11 Technical Documentation
3 items72
- Audit reportCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Press release announcing Cornerstone Galaxy achieved ISO/IEC 42001 certification, the international standard for AI Management Systems aligned to emerging AI regulation.
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Explainer article confirming Cornerstone Galaxy's ISO/IEC 42001 certification and describing its governance controls for bias, human oversight, and continuous monitoring.
https://www.cornerstoneondemand.com/resources/article/iso-iec-42001-explained/
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Trust center lists ISO/IEC 42001:2023, an AI Policy document, and an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS) / AI Governance section, though the documents are gated behind access requests.
Bias Audit Transparency
3 items58
- Audit reportCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Cornerstone summary of Armilla's independent verification of SkyHive Skills Models, including a NYC Local Law 144 bias audit of the 30 most-extracted skills with impact ratios 'within acceptable limits' and 'no evidence of bias.'
- Audit reportCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Armilla case study (assessment dated 30 July 2024) describing robustness and a bias audit of SkyHive's applicant-screening skill extraction following NYC Local Law 144 methodology; full report not publicly downloadable.
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No publicly downloadable full bias-audit report and no second consecutive annual public audit were found on Cornerstone's site or trust center.
FRIA Support
2 items35
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
EU AI Act article that flags recruitment systems as high-risk and states the EU AI Act and GDPR are integral to Cornerstone's responsible-AI commitment, but provides no FRIA template or deployer compliance roadmap.
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No EU AI Act Article 27 Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment template or deployer-obligation guidance was found on Cornerstone's resources, legal page, or trust center.
Data Governance Disclosure
3 items60
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Trust center lists ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, FedRAMP, DoD IL4, GDPR/CCPA/CPRA coverage, and a Data Processing Agreement among governance documents.
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Security & privacy page describing 256-bit TLS encryption, ISO 42001 'responsible and well-governed AI' certification, and built-in privacy supporting global data-protection requirements.
https://www.cornerstoneondemand.com/solutions/security-and-privacy/
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No detailed public training-data description or data-exclusion list was found; data-governance specifics sit behind the gated trust center.
Human Oversight Design
3 items55
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
AI innovation page commits to transparent, ethical AI that mitigates bias and to 'always keep a human in the loop,' referencing an explainable-AI framework.
- Public statementCaptured Jun 7, 2026
States Cornerstone's HR skills intelligence adopts 'explainable AI and human-in-the-loop approaches' so humans can interpret model outputs.
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No public documentation of concrete in-product override controls, decision audit logs, in-interface explanations, or per-jurisdiction oversight toggles was found.
Post-Market Monitoring
3 items45
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Describes ISO 42001 governance requiring 'continuous monitoring, incident management, and improvement' across the AI management system lifecycle.
https://www.cornerstoneondemand.com/resources/article/iso-iec-42001-explained/
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
SafeBase-powered trust center provides a security/compliance document hub and access-request channel for customers.
- AbsenceCaptured Jun 7, 2026
No public continuous-monitoring dashboard, AI model-update changelog, status page, or open vulnerability-disclosure/security-contact page was found outside the gated trust center.
Customer Documentation
3 items60
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Legal hub linking privacy policy, client privacy, terms of service, code of conduct, human-rights and ESG policies for deployers.
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Public AI platform page plus a Framework for Responsible and Ethical AI eBook and EU AI Act resource article covering Cornerstone's AI governance approach.
- DocumentationCaptured Jun 7, 2026
Trust center centralizes compliance documents (certifications, DPA, AI policy) for customers, though many require an access request.
Editorial notes
Company overview
Cornerstone OnDemand, founded in 1999 and headquartered in Santa Monica, California (US), is a long-established enterprise talent-management vendor whose Cornerstone Galaxy platform spans learning, performance, and recruiting. Its AI capabilities center on skills intelligence - most notably the SkyHive Skills Models acquired in 2024 - that extract candidate skills and match people to roles and opportunities. The company is privately held (acquired by Clearlake Capital in 2021) and sells to large enterprise and public-sector buyers, placing it firmly in the enterprise price tier.
Regulatory exposure
Cornerstone's recruiting and skills-matching features are squarely in scope of high-risk AI employment regimes: its own EU AI Act article concedes that recruitment and performance-monitoring systems are 'high risk,' and SkyHive's skill-extraction tooling functions as an automated employment decision tool under NYC Local Law 144, Illinois, and Colorado. The company has materially de-risked this through an ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System certification for Cornerstone Galaxy and an independent Armilla bias verification of SkyHive Skills Models that explicitly applied NYC LL 144 methodology. The main gaps are the absence of a publicly downloadable bias-audit report, any FRIA/Art. 27 deployer template, and detailed public instructions-for-use.
Path to a higher score
Cornerstone could raise its score by publishing the full Armilla assessment report (not just a summary blog) with selection rates and impact ratios, and committing to annual public NYC LL 144 audits; releasing an ungated AI system/model card or instructions-for-use document and exposing the ISO 42001 Statement of Applicability and AI Policy outside the gated trust center; and adding explicit EU AI Act Art. 27 deployer guidance or a FRIA template. Documenting concrete in-product human-oversight controls (override, audit logs, per-jurisdiction toggles) would further lift the human-oversight and customer-documentation scores.
Regulatory frame
What applies to ATS-integrated AI.
Ranking features are inside EU AI Act Annex III §4 (high-risk) and inside NYC Local Law 144 when they affect NYC-based candidates. Customers should treat the AI surface as a distinct deployer-FRIA scope from the rest of the ATS.
Compare
Cornerstone OnDemand against its nearest-scoring peers.
The closest scores in ATS-integrated AI, side by side.
- Side-by-sideCornerstone OnDemand vs Rippling56F
- Side-by-sideCornerstone OnDemand vs Ashby56F
- Side-by-sideCornerstone OnDemand vs Tribepad56F
- Side-by-sideCornerstone OnDemand vs Workday Recruiting AI56F
Ranking
Others rated in ATS-integrated AI
Ranked 13 of 77 by weighted total under rubric v1.0. The ordering is arithmetic on the rubric and carries no view on which tool suits a given hiring process.
- #10Rippling56F
- #11Ashby56F
- #12Tribepad56F
- #13Cornerstone OnDemandThis profile56F
- #14Workday Recruiting AI56F
- #15Gem55F
Conflicts of interest
No vendor pays for placement, scoring, or removal. Casework - the consulting firm that operates this directory - provides paid services to some vendors. Any active or recent (within 24 months) commercial relationship is disclosed on the affected vendor profile and the review is reassigned to an independent reviewer. See the full policy on About.
Casework has no commercial relationship with this vendor.