The result

Ashby and Cornerstone OnDemand tie at 56.

Ashby and Cornerstone OnDemand tie at 56 under rubric v1.0 inside the ATS-integrated cohort, arriving there from different criteria. Ashby leads 4 of the 7 criteria and Cornerstone OnDemand 3, yet the two totals land on the same number. One criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, is both the widest raw gap (Ashby 63, Cornerstone OnDemand 72) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 20% weight it makes up 73% of the weighted advantage Cornerstone OnDemand holds across the 3 criteria it leads.

Criteria won

7 criteria

  • Ashby4
  • Cornerstone OnDemand3
Widest raw gap
Article 11 Technical Documentation63 vs 72
Heaviest weighted swing
Article 11 Technical Documentation20% weight

Keep this comparison

Both scores and all 7 criteria, side by side, in your inbox.

Sent once, with links to turn on alerts for either vendor. No list.

The record

Categories, scope and company facts.

Ashby and Cornerstone OnDemand are both filed under ATS-integrated AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Sourcing.

RecordAshbyCornerstone OnDemand
Price tierMidEnterprise
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20181999

What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. Article 11 Technical Documentation

    20% weight34% of the movement so far

    Ashby63
    Cornerstone OnDemand72

    1.8 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  2. FRIA Support

    15% weight54% of the movement so far

    Ashby42
    Cornerstone OnDemand35

    1.1 weighted points to Ashby

  3. Human Oversight Design

    12% weight69% of the movement so far

    Ashby62
    Cornerstone OnDemand55

    0.8 weighted points to Ashby

  4. Bias Audit Transparency

    18% weight83% of the movement so far

    Ashby62
    Cornerstone OnDemand58

    0.7 weighted points to Ashby

  5. Post-Market Monitoring

    12% weight90% of the movement so far

    Ashby42
    Cornerstone OnDemand45

    0.4 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  6. Data Governance Disclosure

    15% weight95% of the movement so far

    Ashby58
    Cornerstone OnDemand60

    0.3 weighted points to Cornerstone OnDemand

  7. Customer Documentation

    8% weight100% of the movement so far

    Ashby63
    Cornerstone OnDemand60

    0.2 weighted points to Ashby

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +0.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads 0 beside that +0.4.

Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Ashby minus Cornerstone OnDemand, coloured for whichever of the two it favours.

CategoryWeightAshbyCornerstone OnDemandΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6372-9-1.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%6258+4+0.7
FRIA Support15%4235+7+1.1
Data Governance Disclosure15%5860-2-0.3
Human Oversight Design12%6255+7+0.8
Post-Market Monitoring12%4245-3-0.4
Customer Documentation8%6360+3+0.2
Total100%56F56F-+0.4

Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightAshbyCornerstone OnDemand
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain30Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%20Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain30Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%166Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain155Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Ashby has 22 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Cornerstone OnDemand has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Cornerstone OnDemand sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 42 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 22 for Ashby, across 1 distinct source domain, and 20 for Cornerstone OnDemand, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Ashby last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Cornerstone OnDemand last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.

Where next