HomeCompareBrazen vs Covey

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brazen vs Covey

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Covey leads Brazen by 9 points.

Covey scores 47 and Brazen 38 under rubric v1.0, a 9-point gap across the Sourcing and Screening cohorts. Covey leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Bias Audit Transparency, while Brazen leads 1, including Post-Market Monitoring, and 2 are level. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Brazen 30, Covey 72 — and at an 18% weight it carries 79% of the weighted advantage Covey holds across the 4 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Brazen is filed under Screening AI, Covey under Candidate sourcing AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Brazen is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrazenCovey
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20072018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Brazen 30 · Covey 72

    7.6 weighted points to Covey

  2. 15% weight · 82% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Brazen 45 · Covey 52

    1.1 weighted points to Covey

  3. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Brazen 38 · Covey 30

    1.0 weighted points to Brazen

  4. 12% weight · 98% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brazen 46 · Covey 52

    0.7 weighted points to Covey

  5. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Brazen 55 · Covey 58

    0.2 weighted points to Covey

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 5 figures above sum to -8.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 10.5 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -9 beside that -8.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brazen minus Covey.

CategoryWeightBrazenCoveyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4040--
Bias Audit Transparency18%3072-42-7.6
FRIA Support15%2525--
Data Governance Disclosure15%4552-7-1.1
Human Oversight Design12%4652-6-0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%3830+8+1.0
Customer Documentation8%5558-3-0.2
Total100%38 (F)47 (F)-9-8.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrazenCovey
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%1120Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%0101
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Customer Documentation8%0120Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 24 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Brazen last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.