HomeCompareBrazen vs Keka

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brazen vs Keka

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

Brazen takes the total, Keka takes more of the criteria.

Brazen holds a 1-point edge over Keka under rubric v1.0, 38 to 37, across the Screening and ATS-integrated cohorts. Keka leads more of the criteria, 4 against 2 for Brazen, yet Brazen takes Article 11 Technical Documentation, which carries 20% of the rubric, and the weighted sum with it. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Brazen 40, Keka 30 — and at a 20% weight it carries 53% of the weighted advantage Brazen holds across the 2 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Brazen is filed under Screening AI, Keka under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Brazen is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrazenKeka
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSIN
Founded20072014

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 33% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Brazen 40 · Keka 30

    2.0 weighted points to Brazen

  2. 18% weight · 63% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Brazen 30 · Keka 20

    1.8 weighted points to Brazen

  3. 15% weight · 76% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Brazen 25 · Keka 30

    0.8 weighted points to Keka

  4. 15% weight · 88% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Brazen 45 · Keka 50

    0.8 weighted points to Keka

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brazen 46 · Keka 50

    0.5 weighted points to Keka

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Brazen 38 · Keka 40

    0.2 weighted points to Keka

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 6.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.6.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brazen minus Keka.

CategoryWeightBrazenKekaΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4030+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3020+10+1.8
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4550-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%4650-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%3840-2-0.2
Customer Documentation8%5555--
Total100%38 (F)37 (F)+1+1.6

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrazenKeka
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%01—21Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain71Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%01—61Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain287Sources on the vendor's own domain

Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Keka has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 48 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 35 for Keka, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Brazen last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Keka last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.