HomeCompareBrazen vs Paycor

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brazen vs Paycor

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Paycor and Brazen.

Paycor holds a 2-point edge over Brazen under rubric v1.0, 40 to 38, across the ATS-integrated and Screening cohorts. The 7 criteria split 3 to 1 in favour of Paycor, with 3 level: Paycor is ahead on Human Oversight Design and Brazen on Bias Audit Transparency. Human Oversight Design is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Brazen 46, Paycor 55 — and at a 12% weight it carries 51% of the weighted advantage Paycor holds across the 3 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Brazen is filed under Screening AI, Paycor under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Brazen is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrazenPaycor
Price tierEnterpriseMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20071990

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 12% weight · 36% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brazen 46 · Paycor 55

    1.1 weighted points to Paycor

  2. 18% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Brazen 30 · Paycor 25

    0.9 weighted points to Brazen

  3. 15% weight · 90% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Brazen 45 · Paycor 50

    0.8 weighted points to Paycor

  4. 15% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Brazen 25 · Paycor 27

    0.3 weighted points to Paycor

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 4 figures above sum to -1.2 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 3.0 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.2.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brazen minus Paycor.

CategoryWeightBrazenPaycorΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4040--
Bias Audit Transparency18%3025+5+0.9
FRIA Support15%2527-2-0.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%4550-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%4655-9-1.1
Post-Market Monitoring12%3838--
Customer Documentation8%5555--
Total100%38 (F)40 (F)-2-1.2

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrazenPaycor
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31—
FRIA Support15%01—11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%01—41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain246Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Paycor has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Paycor sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 43 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 30 for Paycor, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Brazen last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Paycor last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.