HomeCompareBrazen vs Pin

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Brazen vs Pin

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

2 points separate Pin and Brazen.

Pin (Sourcing) edges Brazen (Screening) by 2 points under rubric v1.0, 40 to 38. The 7 criteria split 5 to 1 in favour of Pin, with 1 level: Pin is ahead on Bias Audit Transparency and Brazen on Article 11 Technical Documentation. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Article 11 Technical Documentation, and Brazen holds it (Brazen 40, Pin 30, 20% weight), worth 100% of the weighted advantage Brazen builds across the 1 criterion it leads.

§ The record

Brazen is filed under Screening AI, Pin under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Scheduling.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only Brazen is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrazenPin
Price tierEnterpriseLow
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20072024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 35% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Brazen 40 · Pin 30

    2.0 weighted points to Brazen

  2. 18% weight · 51% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Brazen 30 · Pin 35

    0.9 weighted points to Pin

  3. 12% weight · 65% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Brazen 38 · Pin 45

    0.8 weighted points to Pin

  4. 15% weight · 78% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Brazen 25 · Pin 30

    0.8 weighted points to Pin

  5. 15% weight · 92% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Brazen 45 · Pin 50

    0.8 weighted points to Pin

  6. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Brazen 46 · Pin 50

    0.5 weighted points to Pin

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to -1.7 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 5.7 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -2 beside that -1.7.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Brazen minus Pin.

CategoryWeightBrazenPinΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%4030+10+2.0
Bias Audit Transparency18%3035-5-0.9
FRIA Support15%2530-5-0.8
Data Governance Disclosure15%4550-5-0.8
Human Oversight Design12%4650-4-0.5
Post-Market Monitoring12%3845-7-0.8
Customer Documentation8%5555--
Total100%38 (F)40 (F)-2-1.7

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrazenPin
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%11Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%11—31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain
FRIA Support15%01—31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%11Sources on the vendor's own domain70Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain51Sources on the vendor's own domain
Customer Documentation8%01—51Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%67Sources on the vendor's own domain325Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain

Brazen has 13 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Pin has 37 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 32 with a source URL, 5 documented absences.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 50 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 13 for Brazen, across 1 distinct source domain, and 37 for Pin, across 1 distinct source domain.

Rubric
v1.0
Brazen last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Pin last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.