§ The result
HiPeople leads Breezy HR on all 7 criteria.
HiPeople finishes 18 points clear of Breezy HR under rubric v1.0 — 61 (D) against 43 (F) — across the Assessment and ATS-integrated cohorts. HiPeople leads every one of the 7 criteria, Breezy HR none of them, and the closest of the 7 is Data Governance Disclosure, Breezy HR 55 to HiPeople 58. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Breezy HR 25, HiPeople 84 — and at an 18% weight it carries 58% of the weighted advantage HiPeople holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.
Vendor profile
Breezy HR
Breezy HR is an SMB-focused applicant tracking system with a drag-and-drop hiring pipeline, multi-board job distribution, scorecards and interview scheduling, plus a credit-metered AI add-on ("Breezy Intelligence") that scores and ranks applicants against job requirements, audits resumes for AI-generated content, and summarizes candidate activity.
Vendor profile
HiPeople
HiPeople is a Berlin-based hiring platform combining a 400+ test skills and personality assessment library, automated AI reference checks, AI resume/application screening that scores candidates against job criteria, and AI screening calls.
§ The record
Breezy HR is filed under ATS-integrated AI, HiPeople under Assessment AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.
Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773. Only HiPeople is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Breezy HR | HiPeople |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Low | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | DE |
| Founded | 2014 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 58% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Breezy HR 25 · HiPeople 84
10.6 weighted points to HiPeople
12% weight · 72% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Breezy HR 38 · HiPeople 60
2.6 weighted points to HiPeople
20% weight · 85% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Breezy HR 50 · HiPeople 62
2.4 weighted points to HiPeople
12% weight · 90% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Breezy HR 55 · HiPeople 62
0.8 weighted points to HiPeople
15% weight · 94% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Breezy HR 30 · HiPeople 35
0.8 weighted points to HiPeople
8% weight · 98% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Breezy HR 58 · HiPeople 66
0.6 weighted points to HiPeople
15% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Breezy HR 55 · HiPeople 58
0.4 weighted points to HiPeople
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to -18.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 18.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads -18 beside that -18.3.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Breezy HR minus HiPeople.
| Category | Weight | Breezy HR | HiPeople | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 50 | 62 | -12 | -2.4 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 25 | 84 | -59 | -10.6 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 30 | 35 | -5 | -0.8 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 55 | 58 | -3 | -0.4 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 55 | 62 | -7 | -0.8 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 38 | 60 | -22 | -2.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 58 | 66 | -8 | -0.6 |
| Total | 100% | 43 (F) | 61 (D) | -18 | -18.3 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Breezy HR | HiPeople | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain | 3 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 3 | 2 | Sources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 4 | 2 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 23 | 9 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 27 | 8 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Breezy HR has 28 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 23 with a source URL, 9 documented absences; HiPeople has 31 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 27 with a source URL, 8 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Breezy HR and HiPeople sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 28 for Breezy HR, across 2 distinct source domains, and 31 for HiPeople, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Breezy HR last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- HiPeople last reviewed
- August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next