HomeCompareBrightHire vs Paycor

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

BrightHire vs Paycor

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

BrightHire leads Paycor on all 7 criteria.

BrightHire, filed under Screening, comes out 11 points above Paycor, filed under ATS-integrated: 51 against 40 under rubric v1.0. Of the 7 criteria Paycor wins none, and the narrowest lead BrightHire holds is on Post-Market Monitoring, BrightHire 42 to Paycor 38. Bias Audit Transparency is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — BrightHire 50, Paycor 25 — and at an 18% weight it carries 40% of the weighted advantage BrightHire holds across the 7 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

BrightHire is filed under Screening AI, Paycor under ATS-integrated AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773 and Colorado AI Act. Only BrightHire is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBrightHirePaycor
Price tierHighMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20191990

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 40% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    BrightHire 50 · Paycor 25

    4.5 weighted points to BrightHire

  2. 20% weight · 61% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    BrightHire 52 · Paycor 40

    2.4 weighted points to BrightHire

  3. 15% weight · 74% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    BrightHire 60 · Paycor 50

    1.5 weighted points to BrightHire

  4. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    BrightHire 36 · Paycor 27

    1.3 weighted points to BrightHire

  5. 12% weight · 91% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    BrightHire 60 · Paycor 55

    0.6 weighted points to BrightHire

  6. 8% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    BrightHire 62 · Paycor 55

    0.6 weighted points to BrightHire

  7. 12% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    BrightHire 42 · Paycor 38

    0.5 weighted points to BrightHire

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +11.4 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +11 beside that +11.4.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is BrightHire minus Paycor.

CategoryWeightBrightHirePaycorΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5240+12+2.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5025+25+4.5
FRIA Support15%3627+9+1.3
Data Governance Disclosure15%6050+10+1.5
Human Oversight Design12%6055+5+0.6
Post-Market Monitoring12%4238+4+0.5
Customer Documentation8%6255+7+0.6
Total100%51 (F)40 (F)+11+11.4

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBrightHirePaycor
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain31—
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%31Sources on the vendor's own domain41Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Human Oversight Design12%31Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%21Sources on the vendor's own domain41Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%167Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain246Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

BrightHire has 23 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 16 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; Paycor has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Paycor sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 53 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 23 for BrightHire, across 2 distinct source domains, and 30 for Paycor, across 6 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
BrightHire last reviewed
August 2, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Paycor last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.