§ The result
Bryq leads ConverzAI by 13 points.
Bryq sits 13 points above ConverzAI under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 44 — with Bryq filed under Assessment and ConverzAI under Screening. The 7 criteria split 6 to 1 in favour of Bryq: Bryq is ahead on Article 11 Technical Documentation and ConverzAI on Bias Audit Transparency. The advantage Bryq holds is spread out: Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing (Bryq 54, ConverzAI 30, 20% weight), yet it supplies only 37% of the weighted points Bryq gains across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Bryq
Bryq is a science-based talent-intelligence platform whose core product is a short, blind, chatbot-driven pre-hire assessment scoring candidates on cognitive ability, personality/behavioral traits, and job skills to produce a job-fit "match" score used for hiring and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
ConverzAI
ConverzAI's Virtual Recruiter is an agentic voice, SMS and email AI agent for staffing firms. It contacts applicants within minutes, runs role-specific screening interviews, scores candidates' fit to open jobs and updates the firm's ATS.
§ The record
Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, ConverzAI under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act and Colorado AI Act. Only Bryq is in scope of Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Bryq | ConverzAI |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | US |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
20% weight · 36% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Bryq 54 · ConverzAI 30
4.8 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 61% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Bryq 62 · ConverzAI 40
3.3 weighted points to Bryq
8% weight · 73% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Bryq 66 · ConverzAI 45
1.7 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 85% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Bryq 40 · ConverzAI 30
1.5 weighted points to Bryq
12% weight · 93% of the movement so far
Human Oversight Design
Bryq 54 · ConverzAI 45
1.1 weighted points to Bryq
12% weight · 97% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Bryq 55 · ConverzAI 50
0.6 weighted points to Bryq
18% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Bryq 70 · ConverzAI 72
0.4 weighted points to ConverzAI
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +12.6 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 13.3 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +13 beside that +12.6.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Bryq minus ConverzAI.
| Category | Weight | Bryq | ConverzAI | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 54 | 30 | +24 | +4.8 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 70 | 72 | -2 | -0.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 30 | +10 | +1.5 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 40 | +22 | +3.3 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 45 | +9 | +1.1 |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 50 | +5 | +0.6 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 45 | +21 | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 44 (F) | +13 | +12.6 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Bryq | ConverzAI | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 2 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on a separate domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Audit reportSources on a separate domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 5 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 24 | 6 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain |
Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; ConverzAI has 30 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 24 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq and ConverzAI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 54 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 30 for ConverzAI, across 3 distinct source domains.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Bryq last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- ConverzAI last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next