§ The result
Bryq leads Qureos on 6 of the 7 criteria.
Bryq finishes 24 points clear of Qureos under rubric v1.0 — 57 against 33 — across the Assessment and Screening cohorts. Bryq leads 6 of the 7 criteria and the remaining criterion is level, so Qureos is ahead on none of them; the closest of the 6 Bryq leads is Customer Documentation, Bryq 66 to Qureos 52. One criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, is both the widest raw gap (Bryq 70, Qureos 12) and the heaviest weighted swing, and at 18% weight it makes up 43% of the weighted advantage Bryq holds across the 6 criteria it leads.
Vendor profile
Bryq
Bryq is a science-based talent-intelligence platform whose core product is a short, blind, chatbot-driven pre-hire assessment scoring candidates on cognitive ability, personality/behavioral traits, and job skills to produce a job-fit "match" score used for hiring and internal mobility.
Vendor profile
Qureos
Qureos is a Dubai-based AI recruiting platform whose Iris agents source candidates, score and rank applicants against recruiter-set criteria, and run AI voice and video interviews with personality scoring, alongside an ATS and a job-seeker marketplace focused on MENA and South Asia.
§ The record
Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, Qureos under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.
Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.
| Record | Bryq | Qureos |
|---|---|---|
| Price tier | Mid | Mid |
| Headquarters | US | AE |
| Founded | 2017 | 2021 |
§ What decides it
The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.
18% weight · 43% of the movement so far
Bias Audit Transparency
Bryq 70 · Qureos 12
10.4 weighted points to Bryq
20% weight · 65% of the movement so far
Article 11 Technical Documentation
Bryq 54 · Qureos 28
5.2 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 76% of the movement so far
Data Governance Disclosure
Bryq 62 · Qureos 44
2.7 weighted points to Bryq
12% weight · 86% of the movement so far
Post-Market Monitoring
Bryq 55 · Qureos 35
2.4 weighted points to Bryq
15% weight · 95% of the movement so far
FRIA Support
Bryq 40 · Qureos 25
2.3 weighted points to Bryq
8% weight · 100% of the movement so far
Customer Documentation
Bryq 66 · Qureos 52
1.1 weighted points to Bryq
Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +24.1 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 24.1 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +24 beside that +24.1.
§ Category-by-category
Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.
Δ is Bryq minus Qureos.
| Category | Weight | Bryq | Qureos | Δ raw | Δ weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 54 | 28 | +26 | +5.2 |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 70 | 12 | +58 | +10.4 |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 40 | 25 | +15 | +2.3 |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 62 | 44 | +18 | +2.7 |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 54 | 54 | - | - |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 55 | 35 | +20 | +2.4 |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 66 | 52 | +14 | +1.1 |
| Total | 100% | 57 (F) | 33 (F) | +24 | +24.1 |
§ Evidence
Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.
An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.
| Criterion | Weight | Bryq | Qureos | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | Cited | Absences | Audit / hosting | ||
| Article 11 Technical Documentation | 20% | 2 | 1 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Bias Audit Transparency | 18% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| FRIA Support | 15% | 2 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Data Governance Disclosure | 15% | 4 | 0 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 6 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Human Oversight Design | 12% | 1 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Post-Market Monitoring | 12% | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 3 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| Customer Documentation | 8% | 4 | 0 | Sources on the vendor's own domain | 4 | 1 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
| All criteria | 100% | 20 | 4 | Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain | 28 | 7 | Sources on the vendor's own domain |
Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Qureos has 35 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 28 with a source URL, 7 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.
Provenance
The scores above are documented by 59 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 35 for Qureos, across 1 distinct source domain.
- Rubric
- v1.0
- Bryq last reviewed
- July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
- Qureos last reviewed
- September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.
§ Where next