HomeCompareBryq vs Tenzo AI

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bryq vs Tenzo AI

Export comparison (CSV)Pro→

§ The result

1 point separates Bryq and Tenzo AI.

Bryq (Assessment) edges Tenzo AI (Screening) by 1 point under rubric v1.0, 57 to 56. Bryq leads 4 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Tenzo AI leads 2, including Bias Audit Transparency, and 1 is level. The widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing are the same criterion, Bias Audit Transparency, and Tenzo AI holds it (Bryq 70, Tenzo AI 83, 18% weight), worth 76% of the weighted advantage Tenzo AI builds across the 2 criteria it leads.

§ The record

Bryq is filed under Assessment AI, Tenzo AI under Screening AI. They record no secondary category in common.

Both are in scope of NYC LL 144, Illinois HB 3773, EU AI Act, Colorado AI Act and Mobley v. Workday.

RecordBryqTenzo AI
Price tierMidMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded20172024

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 18% weight · 31% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bryq 70 · Tenzo AI 83

    2.3 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  2. 20% weight · 56% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bryq 54 · Tenzo AI 45

    1.8 weighted points to Bryq

  3. 12% weight · 72% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bryq 55 · Tenzo AI 45

    1.2 weighted points to Bryq

  4. 15% weight · 86% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bryq 62 · Tenzo AI 55

    1.1 weighted points to Bryq

  5. 12% weight · 96% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bryq 54 · Tenzo AI 60

    0.7 weighted points to Tenzo AI

  6. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bryq 66 · Tenzo AI 62

    0.3 weighted points to Bryq

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 6 figures above sum to +1.3 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 7.4 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +1 beside that +1.3.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bryq minus Tenzo AI.

CategoryWeightBryqTenzo AIΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%5445+9+1.8
Bias Audit Transparency18%7083-13-2.3
FRIA Support15%4040--
Data Governance Disclosure15%6255+7+1.1
Human Oversight Design12%5460-6-0.7
Post-Market Monitoring12%5545+10+1.2
Customer Documentation8%6662+4+0.3
Total100%57 (F)56 (F)+1+1.3

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBryqTenzo AI
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain41Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%21Sources on the vendor's own domain31Sources on the vendor's own domain
Data Governance Disclosure15%40Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
Human Oversight Design12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain60Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%31Sources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain
Customer Documentation8%40Sources on the vendor's own domain50Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%204Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain304Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Bryq has 24 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 20 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; Tenzo AI has 34 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 30 with a source URL, 4 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Bryq and Tenzo AI sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 58 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 24 for Bryq, across 4 distinct source domains, and 34 for Tenzo AI, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Bryq last reviewed
July 17, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Tenzo AI last reviewed
September 25, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.