HomeCompareBullhorn vs Covey

Side-by-side · Rubric v1.0

Bullhorn vs Covey

Export comparison (CSV)Pro

§ The result

Bullhorn leads Covey by 7 points.

Bullhorn scores 54 and Covey 47 under rubric v1.0, a 7-point gap across the ATS-integrated and Sourcing cohorts. Bullhorn leads 6 of the 7 criteria, including Article 11 Technical Documentation, while Covey leads 1, including Bias Audit Transparency. Article 11 Technical Documentation is both the widest raw gap and the heaviest weighted swing — Bullhorn 62, Covey 40 — and at a 20% weight it carries 47% of the weighted advantage Bullhorn holds across the 6 criteria on that side of the table.

§ The record

Bullhorn is filed under ATS-integrated AI, Covey under Candidate sourcing AI. They also share 1 secondary category: Screening.

Both are in scope of EU AI Act, NYC LL 144, Colorado AI Act and Illinois HB 3773.

RecordBullhornCovey
Price tierHighMid
HeadquartersUSUS
Founded19992018

§ What decides it

The criteria that move the gap, heaviest swing first.

  1. 20% weight · 37% of the movement so far

    Article 11 Technical Documentation

    Bullhorn 62 · Covey 40

    4.4 weighted points to Bullhorn

  2. 18% weight · 59% of the movement so far

    Bias Audit Transparency

    Bullhorn 58 · Covey 72

    2.5 weighted points to Covey

  3. 15% weight · 75% of the movement so far

    FRIA Support

    Bullhorn 38 · Covey 25

    1.9 weighted points to Bullhorn

  4. 15% weight · 85% of the movement so far

    Data Governance Disclosure

    Bullhorn 60 · Covey 52

    1.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

  5. 12% weight · 94% of the movement so far

    Human Oversight Design

    Bullhorn 60 · Covey 52

    1.0 weighted points to Bullhorn

  6. 12% weight · 99% of the movement so far

    Post-Market Monitoring

    Bullhorn 35 · Covey 30

    0.6 weighted points to Bullhorn

  7. 8% weight · 100% of the movement so far

    Customer Documentation

    Bullhorn 60 · Covey 58

    0.2 weighted points to Bullhorn

Weighted delta is the raw difference times the criterion weight, so the 7 figures above sum to +6.8 — the difference between the two totals before either is rounded. Shares are of 11.8 points of movement counted without direction. The table below rounds each side to a whole number first, so its Δ raw total reads +7 beside that +6.8.

§ Category-by-category

Raw score per criterion, with weighted delta.

Δ is Bullhorn minus Covey.

CategoryWeightBullhornCoveyΔ rawΔ weighted
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%6240+22+4.4
Bias Audit Transparency18%5872-14-2.5
FRIA Support15%3825+13+1.9
Data Governance Disclosure15%6052+8+1.2
Human Oversight Design12%6052+8+1.0
Post-Market Monitoring12%3530+5+0.6
Customer Documentation8%6058+2+0.2
Total100%54 (F)47 (F)+7+6.8

§ Evidence

Cited sources and documented absences, criterion by criterion.

An absence is a finding, not a blank: the reviewer looked for a named artefact and recorded that it is not located. Where a source sits is a fact about hosting only.

CriterionWeightBullhornCovey
CitedAbsencesAudit / hostingCitedAbsencesAudit / hosting
Article 11 Technical Documentation20%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Bias Audit Transparency18%31Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain20Audit reportSources on a separate domain
FRIA Support15%1101
Data Governance Disclosure15%30Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Human Oversight Design12%21Sources on the vendor's own domain11Sources on the vendor's own domain
Post-Market Monitoring12%11Sources on the vendor's own domain01
Customer Documentation8%31Sources on the vendor's own domain20Sources on the vendor's own domain
All criteria100%156Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domain65Audit reportSources on the vendor's own domainSources on a separate domain

Bullhorn has 20 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 15 with a source URL, 6 documented absences; Covey has 11 evidence rows across 7 of 7 criteria — 6 with a source URL, 5 documented absences; some documentation or audit rows for Covey sit on a domain separate from the vendor's own site.

Provenance

The scores above are documented by 31 evidence rows on file for these two vendors: 20 for Bullhorn, across 2 distinct source domains, and 11 for Covey, across 2 distinct source domains.

Rubric
v1.0
Bullhorn last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team
Covey last reviewed
June 7, 2026 · HireAIScore editorial team

HireAIScore scores are editorial research, not legal advice, and no vendor pays for placement, scoring or removal — see the methodology, conflicts policy and terms.